The U.Ok. Judicial Workplace shared this extract from the transcript of the COPA v Wright trial on March 14, 2024, after Justice James Mellor dominated that Craig Wright just isn’t Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.March 14, 2024:
I thank all of the events for his or her written closing and oral arguments, and so they’ve been very useful certainly. They’ll require me to organize a reasonably prolonged written judgment, which shall be handed down in the end. And for all those that have already been hassling my clerk as to when the judgment shall be prepared, the quick reply is as follows: it will likely be prepared when it is prepared and never earlier than.
Nonetheless, having thought-about all of the proof and submissions introduced to me on this trial, I’ve reached the conclusion that the proof is overwhelming. Due to this fact, for the explanations which shall be defined in that written judgment in the end, I’ll make sure declarations which I’m happy are helpful and are essential to do justice between the events:
First, that Dr. Wright just isn’t the writer of the Bitcoin White Paper.
Second, Dr. Wright just isn’t the one that adopted or operated below the pseudonym “Satoshi Nakamoto” within the interval 2008 to 2011.
Third, Dr. Wright just isn’t the one that created the Bitcoin System.
And, fourth, he isn’t the writer of the preliminary variations of the Bitcoin software program.
Any additional aid shall be handled in my written judgment.
I’ll prolong time for submitting any appellant’s discover till 21 days after the type of order listening to, which shall be appointed following the hand down of my written judgment and I ask the events to hunt to agree an order giving impact to what I’ve simply acknowledged.
Learn extra: Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi, Did not Writer Bitcoin Whitepaper, Decide Guidelines